In civil lawsuits, people frequently have their depositions taken. A deposition is a question and answer session under oath between a witness and at least one attorney. When the witness is testifying on behalf of one party, either the plaintiff or the defendant, Business Law Attorney Near Me in Fourways the opposing party’s attorney will do most of the questioning. Usually, the lawyers for all parties are in the room, although not all of the attorneys present choose to ask questions. There is usually a court reporter present taking down what everyone says on a stenotype machine. There are many reasons for lawyers to take legal depositions.
Here are just a few. Rules The most prominent reason someone has to give a deposition is because a lawyer is not allowed to simply call up a witness for the other side and start asking questions. In fact, Find Attorney By Name they are not allowed to speak to them about the case when that person has been designated as a witness for another party. Instead, it must be done in a formal setting. The witness is usually subpoenaed and the lawyer that has designated that person as a witness will usually be present.Information When an attorney believes someone has information that will lead to discoverable evidence in a civil case, they are allowed to take their deposition.
The witness is required by law to cooperate and answer fully and honestly any of the proper questions asked by the lawyers. Oftentimes, the lawyer may not know all of the important facts of the case. There may be people, objective third parties, who witnessed a car accident or that have factual information that is crucial to the case. Learning what they know about it may shed light on the case before it goes to court. This prevents one side from springing surprises on the other during trial.Intimidation On rare occasions, an attorney will take the deposition of a witness for the other side to intimidate or make the person nervous.
Tensing attorneys want Confederate flag T-shirt barred from evidence, question expert's credentials
This is more common in domestic dispute matters, such as child custody or divorce cases. It also happens more often to the plaintiff, Consumer Law Attorney Near Me the party bringing the lawsuit. This is sometimes done to make sure the witness knows the lawyer means business. Playing hardball in a deposition is what happens when the attorney is purposefully trying to make the witness uncomfortable. This may be done to make sure they tell the truth and to find out if the person will drop the case, rather than have to go through similar questioning in court, as well if the case goes to trial.
Business Law Attorney Near Me in Fourways ?
Advice from business attorneys in MichiganThe relationship between an attorney and a client is a unique one based on facts and information a client may not let many other people be privy to in normal circumstances. A client has a privileged relationship with his or her lawyer, meaning the information shared between them remains confidential and that both parties can choose which elements of the information shall be kept private and which may be disclosed in public.While attorney-client privilege is universally understood, certain types of lawyers are imposed with exceptions to this privilege based on their practice focus within the law. Transactional attorneys have a different type of attorney-client privilege than most lawyers and the extent of the confidentiality privilege to which they are entitled depends upon the nature of the services they provide to a business and the primary purpose of their services. What affects the confidentiality privilege of transactional attorneys?The type of services provided by a transactional lawyer to a company ranges depending on the company's needs. Services may range from being advisory and consultatory in nature, as in business planning and analyzing, to strict legal representation, as in business dispute litigation.If a business attorney is analyzing or advising on business strategy, managing transactions, or providing business consultations on maximizing assets without providing legal representation for a business, he or she is not entitled to attorney-client privilege. As such, he or she is not required to keep information shared by the client confidential.If a transactional attorney is managing or negotiating a business transaction in which legal issues are involved, he or she is serving as a legal representative for the company. He or she is consequently permitted to employ the confidentiality privilege.Why attorney-client privilege mattersThe confidentiality privilege between a lawyer and their client may not seem significant when your company hires a business law attorney to aid in business transactions, help close deals, and learn options for maximizing company assets. However, if a business dispute should happen to arise during or after a business transaction in which your lawyer was involved and he or she did not provide legal representation in his or her services, the information previously shared with the lawyer is not protected by this privilege and can be shared with the other entity involved in the business dispute. If the other side in the dispute attempts to learn the strategies and interactions of your company through an attorney who is not entitled to attorney-client privilege, this lack of confidentiality can serve as a threat to your business. Under business law, certain aspects of your case are not protected by attorney-client privilege.
State Sued Over Medical Marijuana Law, Attorney John Morgan: “Let It Be Smoked.”
JOHN MORGAN FILED HIS LAWSUIT AGAINST THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT JUST BLOCKS FROM THE CAPITOL, WHERE LAST MONTH LAWMAKERS APPROVED THE LAW IMPLEMENTING MORGAN'S AMENDMENT 2 IT ALLOWS CANNABIS TO BE EATEN, APPLIED AS OIL, EVEN VAPED BUT NOT SMOKED. MORGAN'S LAWSUIT WOULD FORCE THE STATE TO ALLOW SMOKING. >> THE VAST MAJORITY IF NOT 100% KNEW THAT SMOKE WAS INCLUDED. SO THE FACT THAT WE ARE HERE TODAY IS REALLY UNNECESSARY BUT HERE WE GO. REPORTER: LOOKING CLOSELY AT AMENDMENT 2 THE ONLY REFERENCE TO SMOKING IT, IS IN A LINE THAT BANS SMOKING MEDICAL MARIJUANA IN ANY PUBLIC PLACE. MORGAN CLAIMS THAT MAKES IT CLEAR, VOTERS EXPECTED IT WOULD BE SMOKED AND HE SAYS LAWMAKERS TOOK AWAY THAT RIGHT. ALL THEY DID IN THE PROCESS WAS TO HURT THE PATIENTS WHO NEED IT THE MOST. REPORTER: MORGAN'S LAWSUIT CITES A 2012 STUDY PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, IN WHICH DR. MARK PLETCHER WROTE, ANALYSES OF PULMONARY FUNCTION AND LUNG DISEASE HAVE FAILED TO DETECT CLEAR ADVERSE EFFECTS OF MARIJUANA USE ON PULMONARY FUNCTION. BUT, HE ALSO WROTE, PRIOR STUDIES OF MARIJUANA SMOKERS HAVE DEMONSTRATED CONSISTENT EVIDENCE OF AIRWAY INJURY AND INFLAMMATION AS WELL AS INCREASED RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS SIMILAR TO THAT SEEN IN TOBACC SMOKERS. FURTHER, THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY POSITION ON THE POSSIBLE HARMS OF MARIJUANA, SMOKED MARIJUANA DELIVERS HARMFUL SUBSTANCES TO USERS AND THOSE CLOSE BY, INCLUDING MANY OF THE SAME SUBSTANCES FOUND IN TOBACCO SMOKE. A SPOKESWOMAN FOR THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT DECLINED TO COMMENT FURTHER UNTIL AFTER A REVIEW OF MORGAN'S LAWSUIT. COMING UP ALL NEW AT 5:00 ON WESH 2 NEWS, WE'LL HEAR FROM A LOCAL PATIENT AND A LOCAL DOCTOR.