Litigation Attorneys Vs Trial Attorneys – What’s The Difference?
Litigation means a trial, right? So what does it matter if you hire a litigation attorney or a trial attorney? Can’t they both perform the same functions? Not necessarily, which is why it’s important to do your research before you hire an attorney to help you with a litigation lawsuit.Litigation AttorneysFirst of all, litigation does not automatically mean a trial is going to happen.
The vast majority of the time, lawsuits are settled out of court without ever going to a jury. This is due to the work of the litigation attorney or litigator.Litigation attorneys handle all of the work that happens outside a courtroom. They file lawsuits, gather evidence, conduct legal research, meet with the client, file and argue motions and defend their clients. This is all done long before a lawsuit even gets close to going to a judge and jury. Litigators may even attempt mediation to achieve an out of court settlement but if a case looks like it is going to go to court, these lawyers can take depositions and prepare clients and their witnesses.
Although there are differences between the two attorneys, those differences don’t make one better than the other. They each serve different functions and perform different roles. Working with both types will give you the best of both worlds: an expert lawyer familiar with the ins and outs of your case and an expert presenter who can best argue your position in court if it gets that far. Many law firms have both litigators and lawyers on staff, giving you access to both types of specialists under one roof.If you prefer to have a single lawyer represent you through the entire process, be sure to ask about his or her experience in court and specifically if it has included cases covering the same legal subjects as yours.
Then you’ll need to decide if the attorney has the experience you need to carry your case through to the end or if you’re better off starting out with a litigator and hiring a trial lawyer if and when your case gets to the courtroom.
State Sued Over Medical Marijuana Law, Attorney John Morgan: “Let It Be Smoked.”
ATTORNEY JOHN MORGAN IS SUING THE STATE OF FLORIDA SAYING TERMINALLY ILL PATIENTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO SMOKE POT. IN NOVEMBER VOTERS APPROVED THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA BILL. Reporter: BOB JORDAN IS QUITE SKILLED AT ROLLING MARIJUANA JOINTS IN HIS HOME IN PARIS. IT'S NOT FOR HIM. IT'S FOR HIS WIFE KATHY WHO SUFFERS FROM ALS. SHE HAS TRIED VAPOR DEVICES. WHAT HAPPENS TO KATHY ISSUE STARTS GAGGING AND GETS ILL. WE HAVE TRIED EDIBLES. SHE CAN'T DO THE EDIBLES BECAUSE ONCE YOU CONSUME IT, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW STRONG IT IS. Reporter: BOB GROWS HIS OWN POT TO MAKE SURE IT IS SAFE. WITH THE CANNABIS SHE CAN TAKE ONE OR TWO PUFFS AND THAT IS ENOUGH. Reporter: ATTORNEY JOHN MORGAN WHO SPEARHEADED THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA ISSUE, CREDITS JORDAN AND HER HUSBAND TO ENCOURAGE HIM TO ACT. SO WHY DID I DO THIS? THERE ARE KATHY JORDANS OUT THERE. THERE ARE 500,000 PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT ARE SICK TODAY AND COUNTING ON THIS. Reporter: THE AMENDMENT MENTIONED SMOKING MARIJUANA AND THAT IT CAN BE SMOKED IN PUBLIC. IF SMOKING IS NOT ALLOWED IN PUBLIC, IS IT ALLOWED IN PRIVATE ? Reporter: MORGAN SAYS YES. SO DOES BOB JORDAN. THAT'S WHAT THEY VOTED FOR. IT'S ABOUT COMMON SENSE. BUT I GUESS COMMON SENSE ISN'T COMMON IN TALLAHASSEE. Reporter: BOB USES VAGUE POT FOR HIS AILMENTS.
Former U.S. Intel Attorney Carrie Cordero: Trump Has Damaged U.S. Reputation | The 11th Hour | MSNBC
BI GONS BY BUY GONS. >> IT'S A DANGEROUS WORLD RIGHT NOW CAB WAB KARI WE'VE GOT RUSSIAN EXPANSIONISM A MESS IN THE MIDDLE EAST IN SYRIA, LIBYA. NORTH KORTH KOREA THE ISSUE. MANY THOUGHT OF THE G20 A OPPORTUNITY PERHAPS FOR AMERICA AND DONALD TRUMP TO RECLAIM THE MANTLE OF LEADERSHIP IN THE WORLD THAT HAS BEEN DETERIORATING OVER THE MONTHS BECAUSE DONALD TRUMP HAS NOT REAFFIRMED THE COMMITMENT UNTIL YESTERDAY AGAIN PROPERLY TO ARTICLE 5 OF NATO. HE HAS NOT TAKEN THE LEADERSHIP ROLES NECESSARY IN A LOT OF THESE PLACES. IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN AT THE G20. IN FACT IF ANYTHING THE LEADERS ON SATURDAY WILL LEAVE THE G20 WITH THE WORLD MORE SPLINTERED PLACE THAN IT WAS WHEN THE MEETING STARTED. WHAT IS THE -- PLACE OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW. >> IT'S REALLY DISHEARTENING FOR THOSE IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY COMMUNITY TO SEE HOW THE PRESIDENT IN SUCH A SHORT TIME HAS DAMAGED THE UNITED STATES'S REPUTATION THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. AND THERE IS A REASON THAT DOZENS OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY EXPERTS AND FORMER OFFICIALS WERE CONCERNED ABOUT KRUFRP BECOMING PRESIDENT ON THE CAMPAIGN AND THERE IS NOTHING HE HAS DONE SINCE HE'S BEEN PRESIDENT THAT CHANGED THAT ASSESSMENT. BUT JUST GOING BACK FOR A SECOND TO WHAT PETER WAS DESCRIBING BEFORE WITH RESPECT TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. WHAT REALLY MATTERS IS THE AGENCY THAT IS WERE INVOLVED IN MAKING THE DETERMINATION, AND THE AGENCY THAT IS HAVE THE RELEVANT RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOOKING AT MAJOR COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ISSUES ARE THE AGENCY THAT IS WERE INVOLVED IN MAKING THAT ASSESSMENT. AND IT'S NOT JUST THE AGENCIES. IT'S THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE WHO SITS ATOP ALL OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. IT'S THE FORMER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND PRESIDENT TRUMP'S CURRENT DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE WHO SUPPORTS THE ASSESSMENT THAT THAT THERE WAS RUSSIAN INFLUENCE ON THE CAMPAIGN. THE FORMER FBI DIRECTOR, THE BIPARTISAN CHAIR AND VICE SIR CHAIR OF THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, BASICALLY EVERYBODY IN A POSITION OF AUTHORITY TO UNDERSTAND IN INTELLIGENCE.